Thursday, November 12, 2009

November Pleasant Dale Park Board Meeting Summary

First off, congratulations to the park district on a successful weekend volleyball tournament. They earned approx. $3k on concessions but had to forfeit their door proceeds to rent chairs for the tournament. Concerns about having spectator seating was brought up at a previous board meeting back in September and dismissed by Nancy McKenna who stated there were bleachers from the old ice rink that would be used. Hopefully they can dig out those old bleachers for future use to save money.

Once again, the park district board meeting began late, starting at 6:48 p.m. Seriously, this just shows a lack of respect for the community members that attend these meetings. Nearly every meeting for the last several months has started late. Board President and fearless leader, Brad Martin, was absent again, this time due to illness. Martin has been on the park board for seven months. He has missed the last three regular board meetings in a row, and at meetings when he does show up, he often arrives late.

Also absent was commissioner Ernie Moon and note-taker Nancy McKenna. Moon called in at 7 p.m. to participate in the meeting by phone but since there wasn't a phone in the board room, as there sometimes is when board members can't make it, he was unable to participate.

Agendas were present at the meeting, but they were different than the agendas that were handed out at the park district on Monday and were not posted on line at the park district web site. According to the June 9th meeting minutes, when Commissioner Carol McMurray asked that items be added to the agenda, Attorney Cainkar explained that the agenda could not be changed without providing 48 hours notice. So it was a little confusing as to why the agenda changed from Monday to Tuesday. In addition, the park board tends to go off on tangents about things that aren't even on the agenda adding to the confusion.

Former state senator Bob Molaro, who earns $2,500 per month contract with the park district as a lobbyist,  attended the meeting and did a presentation on the state of capital funding grants totaling $389,000 that Katherine Parker secured back in May. He reported that the park district will not see that money for approximately 16-18 months. Bummer. Wasn't this the money that was going to pay for the Chalet renovation?

During the consent agenda it was learned that the roofers, who said that they could repair the Chalet roof for $10,000, submitted a bill for $17,000 due to unforeseen problems. Colleen Pettrone asked for the roofer to come to the next board meeting to explain this change. At that point, Carol McMurray inquired that, "We need to know where we are with a total for the Chalet."  That certainly would be nice.

During open forum, Dale Deatsch, the business director from Velocity Sports Performance (VSP) made a pitch to the board on how his company would like to partner with the park district to drive additional business to the Chalet. VSP currently partners with 1st Alliance and Lyons Juniors Volleyball Clubs which are run by Martin's sister in law, Sue Keck. Deatsch stated that he has already met with the Chalet staff as well as Parker and mentioned that the Chalet will be upgrading the weight training equipment. Hmm...wonder where that money will come from?

Also at the meeting to make a pitch to the board was Frank Nunez of Unicus Fitness. Nunez stated they would like to run their fitness programs at the Chalet and won't ask for a dime. They want to provide value to the Chalet and share in a percentage of the revenue/profits. Unicus already partners with the Chalet on various programs. A special meeting will be held on Tuesday, November 17 with both companies making 45 minute presentations to the park board beginning at 7:15.

Also speaking during open forum was school board member Patty Essig, who said it best when she told the park district board that they needed to get their act together.

In other Chalet news, the park district owes Sue Keck $11,000 for the volleyball nets that she supplied and they will either pay it off over time or possibly deduct that debt from her rent. Carol McMurray inquired why there weren't any track lines and the response was that they were too expensive even though at a previous meeting it was stated that there would be lines for the track because it is utilized by the current members.

Since tax bills went out late, the park district won't see the one million dollars they have coming from property taxes until mid to late December. With bond payments due December 1st and no money to pay those, they now have to issue warrants at 2-3% interest which should be paid off within 6 months. The warrants will be issued in $100,000 increments.

The park district is expected to have a summary of all expenses paid out at the Chalet very soon. Let's hope so because we would be very interested in seeing how much money has been put into the Chalet so far.

Finally, during open forum, resident Ken Kuehn, who has attended the last several months of meetings, predicted the park district would be bankrupt by July. That could very well be true with their current financial state, lack of money coming in and the expenses they are incurring. It will be interesting to see how this prediction pans out.

The next park board meeting will be on Tuesday, December 8th at 6:30 p.m. at Walker Park.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

What is up with the September 8th minutes? Mmmmm - somebody not want to reveal what was said at the September meeting about the Chalet renovations? How long does it take to get expenses for a project - come on people it is 2009? Let's see - the Board President's sister-in-law is in at the Chalet and one of the potential performance training businesses is in partnership with his sister-in-law. All we need now is for Mr. Martin to move his business to the Chalet and we can rename the new and improved facility The Martin Chalet. So glad he feels comfortable using community dollars for his own personal use.

Edmund F said...

Anonymous,

First off could you all post as somebody so we can know who we are talking to? Make something up, some kind of handle or something. All these anonymous posts get annoying after awhile. Easy to throw stones........when u r anonymous.

Anonymous said...

As if you are really Edmund F!!!

Edmund F said...

The point is that each unique user of this site has some name associated with them. That is when blogs work best and this site has discussed that everyone should choose some type of name. The anonymous is associated with like 1000 anonymous posts.

Who would you like to be?

Edmund F

Anonymous said...

Yeah and it is also easy to throw stones when you make up a name Edmund F. I think instead of having posts about handle names and anonymity, I think we need to stick to the facts of what is posted on here. Who cares who posts it as longs as it informs people in the community of what is going on. If you want to make friends on here, then maybe you should go somewhere else.

Edmund F said...

Hmmm. "Listening to everyones voice" is the name of this blog, but, whatever.

I think that anonymous is an easy way to hide and fill this blog with blather.

So now "anonymous 2" says, stick to the facts.

And the facts are that the first anonymous post wants to throw the board presidents sister-in-law and Mr. Martin, the board President under the bus? Am I correct?

Ok, lets go more negative and have the second "anonymous" post throw Edmund F off the site because "anonymous" doesn't like his take on subjects.

So "listening to everyone's voice" is really "listening to some peoples voice- what have you got to say only if we agree with you".

Shall I exit?

Admin. said...

Edmund,

I think what the 3 p.m. poster was trying to say was that it is not necessary to know who is who as long as one sticks to the facts.

People develop a certain level of comfort when they can post anonymously and not fear any repercussions. We have always felt that requiring people to identify themselves would limit the conversation.

You said, "So "listening to everyone's voice" is really "listening to some peoples voice- what have you got to say (sic) only if we agree with you."

That is not true. We do not censor comments.

Only listening to some people's voices would imply that we delete the comments we don't agree with. We don't do that. If you'll look back in the archives to late March and early April, people slammed this blog right and left and we allowed every comment to stand. We still do, as long as people don't violate the terms of posting.

You will not find everyone on here in agreement with you nor with us, and that is okay. One of our main goals is to improve communication in our school district and community and we are accomplishing that. Over 19,000 page views on our blog speaks for itself.

We feel that this is a place for people to read about what is going on and to comment freely on what is posted whether they agree with it or not.

Edmund F said...

Alright then, facts and lots of "anonymous" posts, I guess. And since mom22 does not want me to exit..at least I don't think she does...I will stay.